Embedded Files
The many different backgrounds that both students and mentors bring to a research environment creates simultaneous challenges and opportunities. Research shows that diverse working groups can increase creativity and innovation, stimulating discussion of new perspectives or different alternatives to problems (Pfund et al., 71-72). Learning how to address or bridge differences will help mentors with achieving trust and creating clear channels of communication.
Part of that process for mentors is being reflective to identify your own cultural background, beliefs, communications style, or expectations for authority figures and how they affect your work with others.
We all operate with "hidden rules" for communication. In a research setting, a mentor might value being direct and literal. Meanwhile, a student might communicate by focusing more on tone, body language, and the relationship. If a mentor is very blunt, a student might mistake a simple data correction for a personal failure. Recognizing these differing styles prevents small misunderstandings from becoming major barriers to trust.
In addition, rather than trying to "master" every cultural difference, aim for Cultural Humility. While competence implies an end goal, humility is a lifelong commitment to learning and self-critique. It involves being open about your own norms—such as a fast-paced or very deadline-focused, calendar-driven work style—and asking the student how that fits their needs. For gifted students, this approach provides the "psychological safety" they need to share their best ideas without fear of being misunderstood.
Questions to think through as a mentor:
What are the assumptions or the norms you are used to in how you communicate with others, schedule time, or work in a team? What might someone who doesn’t share your background need to know to grasp those expectations?
Report abuse